His new reading of similarities in Marx and Gandhi is also important. Bilgrami establishes a commonality or resemblance in the worlds of Marx and Gandhi`s theory of knowledge and in their critique of the phenomenon of alienation, which is an indispensable character of capitalism in all its avatars. 2. A common convergence between Gandhism and Marxism is (answer A) Mitochondrial DNA is a common cause of genetic diseases and pronuclear transfer technology can also help prevent the transmission of mtDNA diseases. You will have noticed that these two readings of Gandhi, which I call absurd, are made for the other. Both deny exactly what I call his “integrity,” with the latter opinion claiming that he is all and only a philosopher with no serious interest in politics, and the former claim that our interest in him lies solely in his political successes, not in his distant philosophy. The idea of “integrity” is therefore precisely intended to make it clear that these two points of view, in all their frank contrast, have a common underlying error, because they do not perceive what I call Gandhi`s “integrity”. A common convergence between Gandhism and Marxism is the ultimate goal of stateless and classless society, while the means of achieving these end goals are different. I will not try to explain exactly how I tried to do it. It would be difficult to describe him in a brief interview. I would simply like to say that it contains a careful look and critique of how liberal modernity, in its theorization, has presented the perspective and framework of political economics and politics, from Locke`s contractual arguments for property to Locke`s recent playful theatrical consolidations in dilemma-style arguments of multi-person prisoners to the “tragedy of the commons.” and also try to go beyond the limited nature of regulatory responses to these arguments found in Elinor Ostroms (excellent) work on the commons and respond to these arguments.
It is a very strong effort by a contemporary philosopher to address these questions, but at the end of the day, the ideas and arguments I present are really at the service of a critique of liberal modernity that is found in one form or another, both in Marx and Gandhi. But even if I leave aside these affinities with Marx, if I am right that Gandhi thought that India was at the crossroads of Europe in early modern times and that she wanted to anticipate the evolution of political economy (and its harmful cognitive and social effects) in the European modernity that followed, this is an equally good comparison with other divergent radical voices in modern Europe. This is why I considered much of Gandhi`s thought as an intellectual alliance, not only with Marx, but also with pre-existing radical thinkers like Gerrard Winstanley in primitive modernity, who attempted to advance developments (in England, in his case) that he predicted as being of the enclosure and privatization of communes and the transformation of agricultural lifestyles, What we would call “agribusiness” today predicts prospectively. A convergence between Gandhism and Marxism is (a) the ultimate goal of a stateless society (b) Class struggle (c) abolition of private property (d) economic determinism Answer: (a) Capitalists should become the trustees of the country`s wealth and use their genius for the common Weal. Capitalists should, in consultation with society, consolidate nominal profit. . . .